From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-yk0-f179.google.com ([209.85.160.179]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WVMjq-0006g1-W8 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 15:06:03 +0000 Received: by mail-yk0-f179.google.com with SMTP id 9so300450ykp.24 for ; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 08:05:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 17:05:38 +0200 Message-ID: From: Holger Schurig List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Suggestions for new i.MX6 board To: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi list, I'm going to implement barebox to an i.MX6Q based board we've developed in the company I work for. Now the very first question is: to CONFIG_IMX_MULTI_BOARDS or not to CONFIG_IMX_MULTI_BOARDS?? For example, I see in "make xconfig" that some boards are made in a multi-board way, e.g. they are active when CONFIG_IMX_MULTI_BOARDS is set (e.g. Sabrelite). However, there is one that is only visible without that config,. the Armadillo2. Obviously I could do it this are that way, so which should I use? Personally I don't think that it makes sense to compile a barebox binary that runs on different boards, I don't even know how the boot loader would discriminate if it runs on board A or board B ... Or, I could phrase that question differently: from all the existing i.MX6 boards, which one is the one with the least bitrot, i.e. which one should I take as a template? _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox