From: Alexander Shiyan <eagle.alexander923@gmail.com>
To: John Watts <contact@jookia.org>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Fix probing SPI drivers without a cs-gpios node
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2023 21:09:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP1tNvSgOGC3FgGpS8bJjf_WAMZd7RejsO_JCcGX4t8gYdrTzw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y81upA0H8lA7qKQz@novena-choice-citizen>
I dont know. I said how would I do it if it was my patch. I hope
Sasсha will decide how it will be better.
вс, 22 янв. 2023 г. в 20:13, John Watts <contact@jookia.org>:
>
> Hi there,
>
> Yes it would be possible to refactor it to do that.
> Would it be worth it for these few instances?
>
> John
>
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 08:06:04PM +0300, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > These lines can be defined as a regular function like
> > get_cs_gpio_cound(node), isn't it?
> >
> > вс, 22 янв. 2023 г. в 18:06, John Watts <contact@jookia.org>:
> > >
> > > of_gpio_named_count returns a negative value on error but this
> > > is discarded and cast to a u16, making error handling impossible.
> > >
> > > With debug logging enabled this effectively halts booting so the board can
> > > print an error over serial 65534 times.
> > >
> > > Check for this error and proceed as if there are no gpios specified.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: John Watts <contact@jookia.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c | 8 +++++++-
> > > drivers/spi/imx_spi.c | 8 +++++++-
> > > drivers/spi/stm32_spi.c | 8 +++++++-
> > > 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c b/drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c
> > > index ec90330e53..a2314be8ee 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c
> > > @@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_probe(struct device_d *dev)
> > > struct resource *iores;
> > > int ret = 0;
> > > int i;
> > > + int num_gpios;
> > > struct spi_master *master;
> > > struct device_node *node = dev->device_node;
> > > struct atmel_spi *as;
> > > @@ -408,7 +409,12 @@ static int atmel_spi_probe(struct device_d *dev)
> > > master->num_chipselect = pdata->num_chipselect;
> > > as->cs_pins = pdata->chipselect;
> > > } else {
> > > - master->num_chipselect = of_gpio_named_count(node, "cs-gpios");
> > > + num_gpios = of_gpio_named_count(node, "cs-gpios");
> > > + if (num_gpios < 0) {
> > > + num_gpios = 0;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + master->num_chipselect = num_gpios;
> > > as->cs_pins = xzalloc(sizeof(u32) * master->num_chipselect);
> > >
> > > for (i = 0; i < master->num_chipselect; i++) {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/imx_spi.c b/drivers/spi/imx_spi.c
> > > index 3e0ad2db00..b10076639a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/spi/imx_spi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/spi/imx_spi.c
> > > @@ -564,11 +564,17 @@ static int imx_spi_dt_probe(struct imx_spi *imx)
> > > {
> > > struct device_node *node = imx->master.dev->device_node;
> > > int i;
> > > + int num_gpios;
> > >
> > > if (!node)
> > > return -ENODEV;
> > >
> > > - imx->master.num_chipselect = of_gpio_named_count(node, "cs-gpios");
> > > + num_gpios = of_gpio_named_count(node, "cs-gpios");
> > > + if (num_gpios < 0) {
> > > + num_gpios = 0;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + imx->master.num_chipselect = num_gpios;
> > > imx->cs_array = xzalloc(sizeof(u32) * imx->master.num_chipselect);
> > >
> > > for (i = 0; i < imx->master.num_chipselect; i++)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/stm32_spi.c b/drivers/spi/stm32_spi.c
> > > index 639c4f1740..a34e0b143d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/spi/stm32_spi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/spi/stm32_spi.c
> > > @@ -513,8 +513,14 @@ static void stm32_spi_dt_probe(struct stm32_spi_priv *priv)
> > > {
> > > struct device_node *node = priv->master.dev->device_node;
> > > int i;
> > > + int num_gpios;
> > >
> > > - priv->master.num_chipselect = of_gpio_named_count(node, "cs-gpios");
> > > + num_gpios = of_gpio_named_count(node, "cs-gpios");
> > > + if (num_gpios < 0) {
> > > + num_gpios = 0;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + priv->master.num_chipselect = num_gpios;
> > > priv->cs_gpios = xzalloc(sizeof(u32) * priv->master.num_chipselect);
> > >
> > > for (i = 0; i < priv->master.num_chipselect; i++)
> > > --
> > > 2.39.0
> > >
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-22 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-22 15:04 John Watts
2023-01-22 17:06 ` Alexander Shiyan
2023-01-22 17:13 ` John Watts
2023-01-22 18:09 ` Alexander Shiyan [this message]
2023-01-22 18:19 ` John Watts
2023-01-23 8:43 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-01-23 9:47 ` John Watts
2023-01-24 20:05 ` [PATCH v2] spi: Fix probing SPI drivers with no cs-gpios John Watts
2023-01-26 8:14 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAP1tNvSgOGC3FgGpS8bJjf_WAMZd7RejsO_JCcGX4t8gYdrTzw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=eagle.alexander923@gmail.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=contact@jookia.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox