From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-am6eur05on2132.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.22.132] helo=EUR05-AM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iueXy-0004Yv-EL for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:37:32 +0000 From: Hans-Ulrich Schlieben Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:37:27 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1579093362.13056.13.camel@pengutronix.de> <45b34e63-a9fd-2295-311c-393bf49fdf93@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: RE: [yocto] #yocto bootchooser: Cannot get state 'state' To: Ahmad Fatoum , Enrico Joerns , "yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org" Cc: "barebox@lists.infradead.org" Hi Ahmad, i asked phytec about barebox2019 and was told that it supports imx6ul and not imx6q. I should continue to use barebox2017. So I use Barebox2017, which works in zeus with bootchooser. Thank you very much for your great help. hu -----Original Message----- From: Ahmad Fatoum Sent: Tuesday, 21 January 2020 21:21 To: Hans-Ulrich Schlieben ; Enrico Joerns ; yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [yocto] #yocto bootchooser: Cannot get state 'state' Hi, On 1/21/20 6:51 PM, Hans-Ulrich Schlieben wrote: > Hi Ahmad, > > thank you for the great help. There's a lot to learn for me here. >> Does it come from the phytec git directly? Upstream barebox has this: > The zeus image I build here includes layer meta-phytec branch zeus and a custom layer from phytec called meta-ksp0663. > On the custom layer I created a new branch zeus and just renamed the barebox and barebox-targettools bbappend files from 2017 to 2019. > > You are right about the missing state in barebox2019.01. > for barebox 2019 drvinfo just contains: > state > > drvinfo for barebox 2017 says: > state > imx6qdl_phytec_boot_state.19 > Does that mean that the driver is not loaded? This means you have a state driver, but there was no device to bind to. > At the barebox2019 version of_dump returns: Cannot find nodepath state > At the barebox2017 version of_dump returns a full subtree for imx6qdl_phytec_boot_state and the eeprom entry for state. > > Looking into the 2017 barebox sources using find ./ -iname "imx6qdl-phytec*.dtsi" it finds imx6qdl-phytec-state.dtsi: > This file does not exist in the 2019 barebox sources. There is only imx6ul-phytec-state.dtsi available. Ha! That's it. The file is in upstream barebox, so no idea why Phytec dropped it. That's probably a question for Phytec support. Cheers Ahmad > > Now I will try the upstream version. > > Thank you very much for your help. > > Best Regards > > hu > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ahmad Fatoum >> Sent: Monday, 20 January 2020 16:23 >> To: Hans-Ulrich Schlieben ; Enrico >> Joerns ; yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org >> Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org >> Subject: Re: [yocto] #yocto bootchooser: Cannot get state 'state' >> >> Hello, >> >> On 1/16/20 4:09 PM, Hans-Ulrich Schlieben wrote: >>> Hi Ahmad, >>> >>> Thanks to your Mail I tested with barebox_2017.12.0-phy6.bb (thud used barebox_2017.12.0-phy4.bb) and this works in zeus too. >>> >>>> According to the state command output under thud, your state is stored on the EEPROM, not the NAND. Look for update-eeprom in your device tree. >>>> There should also be an /dev/eeprom0.update-eeprom in barebox. >>> That seems right, when working the eeprom is written to on each boot. >>> But I could not find any references to *eep* inside barebox in any layer. >> >> Does it come from the phytec git directly? Upstream barebox has this: >> https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit >> .pengutronix.de%2Fcgit%2Fbarebox%2Ftree%2Farch%2Farm%2Fdts%2Fimx6qdl- >> phytec-state.dtsi%3Fh%3Dnext&data=01%7C01%7Chu.schlieben%40codewr >> ights.de%7Ce3ebad52e8684e97508408d79eaf7bdc%7C0974af9b352b437cb606e9f >> 242c0c227%7C0&sdata=DZxO9KqXifll8fJMkpncakmLGAzbR1uMXnSKziBVzLY%3 >> D&reserved=0 >> >> I would imagine, yours does to. You can check in the yocto build directory. >> (If you have rm_work enabled, you might need RM_WORK_EXCLUDE += "your-barebox-recipe" >> in your local.conf) >> >> Also try of_dump /state inside of barebox to see the device tree node. >> >> The reason, you haven't found it in the deploy/ device tree is that barebox modifies the kernel device tree on loading and adds the state nodes to it. >> >>>> if not, try executing the drvinfo command and see if the driver has probed the EEPROM. >>>>>> Looks like the state node is missing in your device tree. >> >> Do you have the state driver enabled? drvinfo should tell you that. >> >> Cheers >> Ahmad >> >> -- >> Pengutronix e.K. | | >> Steuerwalder Str. 21 | https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pengutronix.de%2F&data=01%7C01%7Chu.schlieben%40codewrights.de%7Ce3ebad52e8684e97508408d79eaf7bdc%7C0974af9b352b437cb606e9f242c0c227%7C0&sdata=82oH7MjlqIb3kDd0NRfhXyWz%2FFYQqD9I7P9YhcfKbKc%3D&reserved=0 | >> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | >> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | > -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pengutronix.de%2F&data=01%7C01%7Chu.schlieben%40codewrights.de%7Ce3ebad52e8684e97508408d79eaf7bdc%7C0974af9b352b437cb606e9f242c0c227%7C0&sdata=82oH7MjlqIb3kDd0NRfhXyWz%2FFYQqD9I7P9YhcfKbKc%3D&reserved=0 | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox