From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RuolC-0004fo-R1 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:23:19 +0000 Received: from dbdp20.itg.ti.com ([172.24.170.38]) by comal.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id q17HNFWo031313 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 11:23:16 -0600 Received: from DBDE70.ent.ti.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dbdp20.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q17HNEgY014027 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 22:53:14 +0530 (IST) From: "Premi, Sanjeev" Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 17:23:13 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Language: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0459177664370927602==" Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: An observation with omap_xload To: "barebox@lists.infradead.org" --===============0459177664370927602== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E28AAFD00EFAA646AE3DF9B89CD24A8931834527DBDE01entticom_" --_000_E28AAFD00EFAA646AE3DF9B89CD24A8931834527DBDE01entticom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yesterday, i spent quite sometime dealing with 'MLO', unable to find 'barebox.bin'. The failure was always: barebox 2012.01.0ABC-00248-g9119228-dirty (Feb 7 2012 - 16:39:43) Board: Texas Instrument's OMAP3EVM Malloc space: 0x87bfff10 -> 0x87ffff0f (size 4 MB) Stack space : 0x4020f000 -> 0x4020fc00 (size 3 kB) booting from MMC1 mounting sd card failed with -22 booting failed Since, I was working mostly off the windows machine, i didn't realize that SD card had only one partition and mount would fail as we explicitly mount "disk0.0" in omap_xload_boot_mmc(). Unfortunately, trying to mount "disk0" didn't help and I got same error. Haven't debugged this further though. Also, would it make sense to try mounting "disk0.0" and "disk0" before returning failure? I am anyways planning to submit a patch changing the message: mounting sd card failed with -22 to Unable to mount disk0.0 (-22) ~sanjeev --_000_E28AAFD00EFAA646AE3DF9B89CD24A8931834527DBDE01entticom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yesterday, i spent quite sometime dealing with 'MLO', unable to find
'barebox.bin'. The failure was always:
 
barebox 2012.01.0ABC-00248-g9119228-dirty (Feb  7 2012 - 16:39:43)<= /span>
 
Board: Texas Instrument's OMAP3EVM
Malloc space: 0x87bfff10 -> 0x87ffff0f (size  4 MB)
Stack space : 0x4020f000 -> 0x4020fc00 (size  3 kB)
booting from MMC1
mounting sd card failed with -22
booting failed
 
Since, I was working mostly off the windows machine, i didn't
realize that SD card had only one partition and mount would
fail as we explicitly mount "disk0.0" in omap_xload_boot_mmc()= .
 
Unfortunately, trying to mount "disk0" didn't help and I got
same error. Haven't debugged this further though.
 
Also, would it make sense to try mounting "disk0.0" and "= disk0"
before returning failure?
 
I am anyways planning to submit a patch changing the message:<= /span>
  mounting sd card failed with -22
to
  Unable to mount disk0.0 (-22)
 
~sanjeev
 
--_000_E28AAFD00EFAA646AE3DF9B89CD24A8931834527DBDE01entticom_-- --===============0459177664370927602== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox --===============0459177664370927602==--