Re: [PATCH 1/2] imx-bbu-nand-fcb: do not use hardcoded devicefile

[Stefano Manni <stefano.manni@gmail.com>]

Hello Ahmad,

On lun, mar 3 2025 at 09:41:53 +01:00:00, Ahmad Fatoum 
<a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> On 24.02.25 16:49, Stefano Manni wrote:
>>  Hello Ahmad,
>> 
>>  On ven, feb 21 2025 at 18:33:04 +01:00:00, Ahmad Fatoum 
>> <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>>>  Hello Stefano,
>>> 
>>>  On 21.02.25 19:01, Stefano Manni wrote:
>>>>   Device file was hardcoded to "nand0.barebox".
>>>>   This patch harmonize the signature of
>>>> 
>>>>   imx6_bbu_nand_register_handler()
>>>>   imx7_bbu_nand_register_handler()
>>>>   imx28_bbu_nand_register_handler()
>>>> 
>>>>   with the other bbu register functions in order to take
>>>>   the devicefile as parameter.
>>> 
>>>  Is this this the sole motivation behind the patch or do you
>>>  intend to actually make use of the ability of varying
>>>  the devicefile?
>> 
>>  my purpose is to let people use a device/partition different from 
>> the hardcoded one.
> 
> Can you have multiple NANDs? But yes, customizing partition name can
> be useful.
> 

for sure I cannot have multiple NANDs but I can have a different 
partition name.

Anyway drop the patch if you consider it not necessary.

Best,
Stefano

> Thanks,
> Ahmad