mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomas Marek <tomas.marek@elrest.cz>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] i2c: efi: avoid 64-bit division
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 07:53:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zr2XxoD4Gce7bTB4@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240814092424.39878-5-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>

Hello Ahmad,

Thanks for maintenance of the Barebox EFI.

On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 11:24:23AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> I2C message length is 16 bit, so doing a 64-bit division is overkill.
> Let's remove the cast and just rely on the usual integer promotion
> to 32-bit.
> 
> Cc: Tomas Marek <tomas.marek@elrest.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-efi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-efi.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-efi.c
> index 5f6cc0eed28e..a666a28fab51 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-efi.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-efi.c
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static unsigned int efi_i2c_msg_op_cnt(const struct efi_i2c_priv *i2c_priv,
>  
>  	max_len = efi_i2c_max_len(i2c_priv, msg);
>  
> -	return ((u64)msg->len + max_len - 1) / max_len;
> +	return (msg->len + max_len - 1) / max_len;

The issue here is that max_len, which represents the MaximumReceiveBytes
or MaximumTransmitBytes in EFI I2C capabilities, is 32-bit. In some EFI
implementations (including the one I use), the EFI I2C MaximumReceiveBytes
and MaximumTransmitBytes are set to the maximum value (0xFFFFFFFF). This
causes msg->len + max_len - 1 to overflow, leading to an incorrect number
of returned operations. To address this, the msg->len is extended to 64 bits.

Best regards

Tomas

>  }
>  
>  static unsigned int efi_i2c_req_op_cnt(
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-15  5:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-14  9:24 [PATCH 1/6] common: pe: fix use of undefined macro for ARMv7 Ahmad Fatoum
2024-08-14  9:24 ` [PATCH 2/6] efi: fs: fix determination of read-only files Ahmad Fatoum
2024-08-14  9:24 ` [PATCH 3/6] filetype: fix else clause indentation Ahmad Fatoum
2024-08-14  9:24 ` [PATCH 4/6] acpi: fix compilation for 32-bit Ahmad Fatoum
2024-08-14  9:24 ` [PATCH 5/6] i2c: efi: avoid 64-bit division Ahmad Fatoum
2024-08-15  5:53   ` Tomas Marek [this message]
2024-08-15  6:57     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-08-19  6:16       ` Sascha Hauer
2024-08-14  9:24 ` [PATCH 6/6] net: fsl_enetc: fix compilation for 32-bit Ahmad Fatoum
2024-08-14 11:08 ` [PATCH 1/6] common: pe: fix use of undefined macro for ARMv7 Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zr2XxoD4Gce7bTB4@debian \
    --to=tomas.marek@elrest.cz \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox