mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ci: container: downgrade OpenRISC toolchain from 14.2.0 to 13.1.0
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 07:21:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZsgqYSMofDiMHcsq@antec> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afdd2beb-5828-4486-a479-0eef78ab91b3@pengutronix.de>

On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 06:43:23PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 18.08.24 19:09, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> > Hello Stafford,
> > 
> > On 18.08.24 09:14, Stafford Horne wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 06:14:35PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> >>> The newest toolchain bump breaks OpenRISC start-up under QEMU: The console is
> >>> now completely silent. Steps to reproduce the hang:
> 
> Turns out the toolchain update was not to blame, but the Debian container bump
> that accompanied it. It moved the default console as part of adding three
> more consoles to the platform. I am not sure that move was intended, so I submitted
> a QEMU patch for that[1].
> 
> For barebox, I think we'l just break compatibility with older QEMU, describe
> all 4 UARTs and use CONFIG_CONSOLE_ACTIVATE_ALL.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20240822163838.3722764-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de/
>      Should show it once lore has indexed the mail

Thanks,

I didnt get a chance to look into it yet, thats for sorting it out.  I see the
patches and will reply.  I am not sure why the uarts were done in that order.

Maybe Jason know's why.

-Stafford

> >>>
> >>>   CONTAINER_GCC13=bdfdd5effcc169ebf8a9df2f1a5956ef34549682f78b450a97aceea2afd76f7a
> >>>   CONTAINER_GCC14=fa35adeae1ab49b4dc09fc3bf4d68f92541a0d1f41e0df91a4879fd331e4b592
> >>>   CONTAINER_BASE=ghcr.io/barebox/barebox/barebox-ci@sha256:fa35adeae1a
> >>>
> >>>   export CONTAINER=${CONTAINER_BASE}@sha256:${CONTAINER_GCC14}
> >>>   export LG_BUILDDIR=build-openrisc
> >>>   ./scripts/container.sh ./MAKEALL -a openrisc -O $LG_BUILDDIR
> >>>   ./scripts/container.sh pytest --lg-env test/openrisc/generic_defconfig.yaml \
> >>> 	--interactive
> >>>
> >>> Running the same steps, but with the older toolchain boots successfully:
> >>>
> >>>   export CONTAINER=${CONTAINER_BASE}@sha256:${CONTAINER_GCC13}
> >>>   export LG_BUILDDIR=build-openrisc
> >>>   git checkout v2024.08.0
> >>>   ./scripts/container.sh ./MAKEALL -a openrisc -O $LG_BUILDDIR
> >>>   ./scripts/container.sh pytest --lg-env test/openrisc/generic_defconfig.yaml \
> >>> 	--interactive
> >>>
> >>> The hang happens somewhere before the jump to _start in arch/openrisc/cpu/start.S.
> >>> Until that's fixed, let's pin the OpenRISC GCC version to the old v13.1.0.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
> >>> ---
> >>> @Stafford, do you have an idea what could cause this?
> >>
> >> Hi I am not sure about this, no new changes in the or1k-linux toolchain that I
> >> know about.  I will try to reproduce and see what is going wrong.
> > 
> > That would be great, thanks! I had a typo in the instructions above,
> > CONTAINER_BASE is not supposed to have @sha256:fa35adeae1a at the end.
> > 
> > I tried to debug this by importing _emergency_putc from the kernel and
> > seeing where it's getting stuck. I tried on the working case (GCC13) and
> > calling _emergency_putc before _start doesn't work. Unfortunately, that's
> > where it hangs (or maybe, code isn't executed at all?) for GCC14 so that
> > didn't help me narrow down the issue.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Ahmad
> > 
> >>
> >> -Stafford 
> >>
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
> Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-23  6:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-14 16:14 [PATCH 1/3] debug_ll: ns16550: fix prototype in documentation comment Ahmad Fatoum
2024-08-14 16:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] openrisc: implement C debug_ll for NS16550 Ahmad Fatoum
2024-08-14 16:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] ci: container: downgrade OpenRISC toolchain from 14.2.0 to 13.1.0 Ahmad Fatoum
2024-08-15  8:49   ` (subset) " Sascha Hauer
2024-08-18  7:14   ` Stafford Horne
2024-08-18 17:09     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-08-22 16:43       ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-08-23  6:21         ` Stafford Horne [this message]
2024-08-15  8:50 ` (subset) [PATCH 1/3] debug_ll: ns16550: fix prototype in documentation comment Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZsgqYSMofDiMHcsq@antec \
    --to=shorne@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox