From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Bastian Krause <bst@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] keytoc: fix env provided keyspec handling
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 08:16:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJLzTeaUdRxkN1dc@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250805200754.tpbu2pypgaz6gk2g@pengutronix.de>
On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 10:07:54PM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> On 25-08-05, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > +Cc Basti
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 03:50:56PM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > > Currently the env provided keyspec is resolved during the gen_key() step
> > > by making use of the try_resolve_env(). This is wrong because it will
> > > set the complete <hint>:<key> keyspec string for the 'keyname' and 'path'.
> > >
> > > To fix this the resolve step must happen during the main-loop as first step
> > > because the main-loop is doing the 'keyname' and 'path' split already.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
> > > ---
> > > scripts/keytoc.c | 13 +++++--------
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/scripts/keytoc.c b/scripts/keytoc.c
> > > index 617317d6607e..105fa4b5413d 100644
> > > --- a/scripts/keytoc.c
> > > +++ b/scripts/keytoc.c
> > > @@ -615,10 +615,6 @@ static int gen_key(const char *keyname, const char *path)
> > > char *tmp, *key_name_c;
> > >
> > > /* key name handling */
> > > - keyname = try_resolve_env(keyname);
> > > - if (!keyname)
> > > - exit(1);
> > > -
> > > tmp = key_name_c = strdup(keyname);
> > >
> > > while (*tmp) {
> > > @@ -628,10 +624,6 @@ static int gen_key(const char *keyname, const char *path)
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* path/URI handling */
> > > - path = try_resolve_env(path);
> > > - if (!path)
> > > - exit(1);
> > > -
> >
> > This was introduced by Basti in 685cc602e0ad ("keytoc: allow __ENV__
> > lookup for keyname hint") to support:
> >
> > CONFIG_CRYPTO_PUBLIC_KEYS="__ENV__FIT_KEY_NAME_HINT:__ENV__FIT_KEY"
>
> Right, albeit I don't see why there should be two separate environment
> variables for specifying one keyspec entry.
>
> > I believe this patch breaks this usecase.
>
> Of course :-/ but at the moment the simple use-case:
>
> __ENV__FITKEY -> FITKEY="hint:<key>"
>
> is broken. IMHO having two separate ENV variables is rather counter
> intuitive. I also found myself in the following situation:
>
> __ENV__FITKEYS -> FITKEYS="hint:<key> hint-2:<key-2> <key-3>"
>
> This is not supported as well. So we should really define and document
> the ENV behavior.
Let's recap the different possibilities. Plain without __ENV__
substitution we would have:
CONFIG_CRYPTO_PUBLIC_KEYS="pkcs11:object=foo"
CONFIG_CRYPTO_PUBLIC_KEYS="myhint:pkcs11:object=foo"
CONFIG_CRYPTO_PUBLIC_KEYS="myhint:pkcs11:object=foo /foobar/baz.der"
CONFIG_CRYPTO_PUBLIC_KEYS="myhint:pkcs11:object=foo myotherhint:/foobar/baz.der"
With Bastis patch we also support:
myhint="myhint"
myname="pkcs11:object=foo"
CONFIG_CRYPTO_PUBLIC_KEYS="__ENV__myhint:__ENV__myname"
Now you want to support:
mykeys="myhint:pkcs11:object=foo"
CONFIG_CRYPTO_PUBLIC_KEYS="__ENV__mykeys"
This would be easy to do by adding the call to try_resolve_env() in the
loop like you did. You could keep the calls to try_resolve_env() in
gen_key() in place to still support Bastis usecase.
The other thing you like to support is:
mykeys="myhint:pkcs11:object=foo myotherhint:/foobar/baz.der"
CONFIG_CRYPTO_PUBLIC_KEYS="__ENV__mykeys"
This is more complicated. Right now we assume one single key in each
argv[] element and consequently call gen_key() for each element. With
the above an argv[] element can expand to multiple keys and we would
have to split this up first.
One way would be to do all __ENV__ substitutions upfront.
Not sure if it's worth the hassle though.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-06 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-24 13:50 [PATCH v2 1/2] keytoc: make keyspec a const char pointer Marco Felsch
2025-07-24 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] keytoc: fix env provided keyspec handling Marco Felsch
2025-08-05 8:12 ` Sascha Hauer
2025-08-05 20:07 ` Marco Felsch
2025-08-06 6:16 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2025-08-06 7:54 ` Marco Felsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJLzTeaUdRxkN1dc@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=bst@pengutronix.de \
--cc=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox