From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:50:59 +0100 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1pSIBY-008STv-Oc for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:50:59 +0100 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pSIBW-0004gi-1c for lore@pengutronix.de; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:50:58 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=RqT2zJb3nFZ8VsRZAJ5UGa5cpF4ctemU6WGU+eui7yM=; b=Wvvm5CAm3ER33b1/lKU7u8BA0G D7qcMPJPfuoL5lFJ7PG3V96dOtrMHFbw1pL06tJs/TQLLsa5QmoHhvUwNEzYfPGQLTB2kanDqREvs pKnlMLINcFYNpytzo+Dnu3ve/WKMO8qA9sCPaYLVwRYQ/0v1FhaP5SBXyfrtzlCsed8+ooDBf9e7V mbkBvCyamcbJJ3m03neO2KDA8ujhVL4aN50aJBejbk09VI/3YOo0OJo0z90e1ENdp1xTg9QPiwlnl G/Uqp8XBENdLDG5S7x2vPtCsHES1XbcHuJHHLwuieDU0ICRdqOAZv8pgANudvAM7O+ujUy77ZB2oD PONg57Ow==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pSIAF-0066Un-6E; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:49:39 +0000 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pSIA9-0066Rl-Vu for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:49:35 +0000 Received: from ptz.office.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:900:1d::77] helo=[IPv6:::1]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pSIA2-0004Bn-59; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:49:26 +0100 Message-ID: From: Enrico =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rns?= To: Alexander Kanavin , Otavio Salvador Cc: Richard Purdie , Marco Felsch , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, yocto@pengutronix.de, barebox@lists.infradead.org Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:49:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20230203135011.2061939-1-m.felsch@pengutronix.de> <12e370a3183d04572da1c5749d8e64dcf5091a0c.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <7f5ebf2315c969ce7c76d024ec373f45cc8eff3f.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1+deb11u1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230215_054934_048516_DFA4C4AD X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.27 ) X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2607:7c80:54:3::133 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on metis.ext.pengutronix.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] barebox: add initial support X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de) Am Mittwoch, dem 15.02.2023 um 14:43 +0100 schrieb Alexander Kanavin: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 12:22, Otavio Salvador > wrote: > > > Fair enough, I'm open to the idea. It would be interesting/useful to > > > see if anyone else in the community is in favour of this or not. I'm > > > sure you appreciate why we need to ask the question and why we can't > > > just add everything! :) > > > > > > The community usage does appear to be primarily phytec/ptx. > > > > > > I have used barebox in some projects in the past for multiple customers. It is a solid and > > commonly used bootloader. I consider U-Boot the industry standard, but Barebox is also widely > > used, and it makes sense to be part of OE-Core. > > I do not quite understand why barebox needs to be specifically in > oe-core. There's a well maintained layer for it: > https://github.com/menschel-d/meta-barebox > so once all those meta-phytec recipes are phased out in favour of > using that layer, there's no fragmentation. > You forgot to mention https://github.com/pengutronix/meta-ptx/tree/master/recipes-bsp/barebox I did never say that fragmentation is my only motivation. Regards, Enrico -- Pengutronix e.K.                           | Enrico Jörns                | Embedded Linux Consulting & Support        | https://www.pengutronix.de/ | Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | Phone: +49-5121-206917-180  | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9    |