From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1eFcsh-0007mc-D7 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 09:24:17 +0000 References: <20170816101644.20022-1-bst@pengutronix.de> <31a8bead-d908-23a1-60d5-bb9ebfbc5c89@pengutronix.de> <20171117084854.ugrlf5a2vnmsoz3v@pengutronix.de> From: Bastian Stender Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:23:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171117084854.ugrlf5a2vnmsoz3v@pengutronix.de> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: add timeout waiting for bus ready To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On 11/17/2017 09:48 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 12:11:03PM +0100, Bastian Stender wrote: >> On 08/16/2017 12:16 PM, Bastian Stender wrote: >>> This prevents barebox hanging e.g. in case the i2c clock is accidentally >>> connected to GND. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bastian Stender >>> --- >> >> Any thoughts on this one? > > Patch looks fine. I must have overlooked it. Should I apply it as > is? Yes, please. I did a quick test and the patch still works as expected :) Bastian -- Pengutronix e.K. Industrial Linux Solutions http://www.pengutronix.de/ Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox