From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from astoria.ccjclearline.com ([64.235.106.9]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1TZSW7-0003hc-Ku for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:28:00 +0000 Received: from cpebcc8100fb8db-cmbcc8100fb8d8.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([174.116.196.46]:52345 helo=crashcourse.ca) by astoria.ccjclearline.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TZSW6-0005nZ-9e for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:27:58 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:27:55 -0500 (EST) From: "Robert P. J. Day" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: are there still issues with building sandbox on x86_64? To: "U-Boot Version 2 (barebox)" perusing the page in the wiki discussing sandbox: http://wiki.barebox.org/doku.php?id=user:building which mentions problems with sandbox on x86_64. i've had no trouble building and running sandbox under ubuntu on my 64-bit asus laptop. are there specific known issues? thanks. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ======================================================================== _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox