* apparent inconsistency in barebox doc content
@ 2012-12-04 12:13 Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2012-12-04 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: U-Boot Version 2 (barebox)
i'm not familiar with the in-barebox documentation (the "@brief" and
"@return" stuff), i'm assuming that's similar to kerneldoc, yes? so
this snippet in arch/arm/boards/beagle/board.c doesn't look right:
,... snip ...
*
* @return void
*/
static int beagle_board_init(void)
{
... snip ...
am i right in concluding there's a mismatch there? and should i
flag anywhere else i run across mismatches like that?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2012-12-04 12:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-12-04 12:13 apparent inconsistency in barebox doc content Robert P. J. Day
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox