From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Barebox List <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 32/34] ARM: mmu32: Use pages for early MMU setup
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 16:21:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b5cfdb55-6cfb-3b27-bd31-270c4afb9b3a@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230517090340.3954615-33-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
On 17.05.23 11:03, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Up to now we use 1MiB sections to setup the page tables in PBL. There
> are two places where this leads to problems. First is OP-TEE, we have
> to map the OP-TEE area with PTE_EXT_XN to prevent the instruction
> prefetcher from speculating into that area. With the current section
> mapping we have to align OPTEE_SIZE to 1MiB boundaries. The second
> problem comes with SRAM where the PBL might be running. This SRAM has
> to be mapped executable, but at the same time we should map the
> surrounding areas non executable which is not always possible with
> 1MiB mapping granularity.
>
> We now have everything in place to use two level page tables from PBL,
> so use arch_remap_range() for the problematic cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/mmu_32.c | 31 +++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/mmu_32.c b/arch/arm/cpu/mmu_32.c
> index 785b20c7fd..705d27a045 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/mmu_32.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/mmu_32.c
> @@ -111,8 +111,10 @@ void dma_flush_range(void *ptr, size_t size)
> unsigned long end = start + size;
>
> __dma_flush_range(start, end);
> +#ifndef __PBL__
> if (outer_cache.flush_range)
> outer_cache.flush_range(start, end);
> +#endif
Meh. I see why this is ok (L2X0 currently initialized in initcall), but this
#ifdef looks a bit too fragile. Perhaps, we could do this in <asm/mmu.h> instead?
#ifdef __PBL__
/* Existing platforms with non-architected outer cache initialize it
* outside PBL and new ones will likely only have architected caches,
* so we provide a dummy here
*/
static __maybe_unused struct outer_cache_fns outer_cache;
#else
extern struct outer_cache_fns outer_cache;
#endif
> }
>
> void dma_inv_range(void *ptr, size_t size)
> @@ -120,8 +122,10 @@ void dma_inv_range(void *ptr, size_t size)
> unsigned long start = (unsigned long)ptr;
> unsigned long end = start + size;
>
> +#ifndef __PBL__
> if (outer_cache.inv_range)
> outer_cache.inv_range(start, end);
> +#endif
> __dma_inv_range(start, end);
> }
>
> @@ -542,16 +546,6 @@ void *dma_alloc_writecombine(size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle)
> return dma_alloc_map(size, dma_handle, ARCH_MAP_WRITECOMBINE);
> }
>
> -static inline void map_region(unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
> - uint64_t flags)
> -
> -{
> - start = ALIGN_DOWN(start, SZ_1M);
> - size = ALIGN(size, SZ_1M);
> -
> - create_sections(start, start + size - 1, flags);
> -}
> -
> void mmu_early_enable(unsigned long membase, unsigned long memsize)
> {
> uint32_t *ttb = (uint32_t *)arm_mem_ttb(membase + memsize);
> @@ -572,21 +566,10 @@ void mmu_early_enable(unsigned long membase, unsigned long memsize)
> */
> create_flat_mapping();
>
> - /*
> - * There can be SoCs that have a section shared between device memory
> - * and the on-chip RAM hosting the PBL. Thus mark this section
> - * uncachable, but executable.
> - * On such SoCs, executing from OCRAM could cause the instruction
> - * prefetcher to speculatively access that device memory, triggering
> - * potential errant behavior.
> - *
> - * If your SoC has such a memory layout, you should rewrite the code
> - * here to map the OCRAM page-wise.
> - */
> - map_region((unsigned long)_stext, _etext - _stext, PMD_SECT_DEF_UNCACHED);
> -
> /* maps main memory as cachable */
> - map_region(membase, memsize - OPTEE_SIZE, PMD_SECT_DEF_CACHED);
> + arch_remap_range((void *)membase, memsize - OPTEE_SIZE, MAP_CACHED);
> + arch_remap_range((void *)membase + memsize - OPTEE_SIZE, OPTEE_SIZE, MAP_UNCACHED);
> + arch_remap_range(_stext, PAGE_ALIGN(_etext - _stext), MAP_CACHED);
Rest looks fine. With above point addressed:
Reviewed-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
>
> __mmu_cache_on();
> }
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-17 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-17 9:03 [PATCH v2 00/34] ARM: MMU rework Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 01/34] ARM: remove unused membase argument Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:45 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 02/34] ARM: remove unused define Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:45 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 03/34] ARM: rename __arm_mem_scratch to arm_mem_scratch Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:46 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 04/34] ARM: put scratch mem area below OP-TEE Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:48 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 13:14 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 15:50 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 05/34] ARM: add arm_mem_optee() Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:53 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 06/34] ARM: make arm_mem_scratch() a static inline function Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:53 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 07/34] ARM: define stack base consistently Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:55 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 08/34] ARM: move arm_mem_scratch_get() lower for consistency Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:57 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 09/34] ARM: drop cache function initialization Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 10/34] ARM: Add _32 suffix to aarch32 specific filenames Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 11/34] ARM: cpu.c: remove unused include Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 12/34] ARM: mmu-common.c: use common mmu include Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 13/34] ARM: mmu32: rename mmu.h to mmu_32.h Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 14/34] ARM: mmu: implement MAP_FAULT Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 15/34] ARM: mmu64: Use arch_remap_range where possible Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 16/34] ARM: mmu32: implement zero_page_*() Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 17/34] ARM: i.MX: Drop HAB workaround Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:01 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 18/34] ARM: Move early MMU after malloc initialization Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 19/34] ARM: mmu: move dma_sync_single_for_device to extra file Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 20/34] ARM: mmu: merge mmu-early_xx.c into mmu_xx.c Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 21/34] ARM: mmu: alloc 64k for early page tables Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:03 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 22/34] ARM: mmu32: create alloc_pte() Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:07 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 23/34] ARM: mmu64: " Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:15 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 13:17 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 24/34] ARM: mmu: drop ttb argument Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:23 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 25/34] ARM: mmu: always do MMU initialization early when MMU is enabled Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:29 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 26/34] ARM: mmu32: Assume MMU is on Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:36 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 27/34] ARM: mmu32: Fix pmd_flags_to_pte() for ARMv4/5/6 Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:39 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 28/34] ARM: mmu32: Add pte_flags_to_pmd() Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:43 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 14:44 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 29/34] ARM: mmu32: add get_pte_flags, get_pmd_flags Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:46 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 30/34] ARM: mmu32: move functions into c file Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:48 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 31/34] ARM: mmu32: read TTB value from register Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:58 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 14:39 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-19 6:53 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-19 7:44 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-19 7:52 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 32/34] ARM: mmu32: Use pages for early MMU setup Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 14:21 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2023-05-22 8:14 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 33/34] ARM: mmu32: Skip reserved ranges during initialization Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 14:43 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 14:55 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 15:56 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 34/34] ARM: mmu64: Use two level pagetables in early code Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b5cfdb55-6cfb-3b27-bd31-270c4afb9b3a@pengutronix.de \
--to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox