From: list@schmidt-andreas.de
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: cpsw: remove unnecessary mdiobus_scan()
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:08:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7c837eb63fe7d64236a54b5da612904@schmidt-andreas.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180219065402.dbiv3vke2kqwhfdj@pengutronix.de>
On 2018-02-19 07:54, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 10:18:16AM +0100, Andreas Schmidt wrote:
[...]
>> On 16.02.2018 08:39, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>> > No need to call mdiobus_scan() manually. it is called from
>> > phy_device_connect() already in cpsw_open() which does all
>> > the magic to connect a network device with its phy.
>> You added call of mdiobus_scan to check if the slave has valid phy, I
>> guess.
>> Or I misunderstood your commit:
>> b2568de82d62c18fd5dc8affb0e4dc050403c498
>> net: cpsw: ignore error on slave setup ?
>>
>> I guess it should work in follow:
>> If slave has a valid phy (determined by mdiobus_scan), slave will be
>> continue to register (call eth_register),
>> if not, cpsw_clave_setup function will exit with an error and next
>> slave
>> will be try to register.
>
> You're right. I have overlooked the case that we do not want to
> register
> ethernet devices for slaves which do not have a valid phy.
>
> In this case, how about the following variant?
Yes, it's better. I tested it with fixed-link and with real phy and it
works.
Except a little bug, see comments below.
Thanks!
>
>
> Sascha
>
> -----------------------------8<------------------------------------
>
> From 44e7a94624f920188f55ca3fb45e9b74ba10e0c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 07:50:56 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] net: cpsw: Call phy_device_connect() earlier
>
> We only want to register a slave when a valid phy is available.
> Instead of manually calling mdiobus_scan() and phy_register_device()
> we can let this do from phy_device_connect() which also works for
> fixed phys.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/cpsw.c | 18 +++---------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/cpsw.c
> index d11ca33f70..70e2721dd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/cpsw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/cpsw.c
> @@ -761,11 +761,6 @@ static int cpsw_open(struct eth_device *edev)
>
> dev_dbg(&slave->dev, "* %s\n", __func__);
>
> - ret = phy_device_connect(edev, &priv->miibus, slave->phy_id,
> - cpsw_adjust_link, 0, slave->phy_if);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> /* soft reset the controller and initialize priv */
> soft_reset(priv, &priv->regs->soft_reset);
>
> @@ -913,16 +908,9 @@ static int cpsw_slave_setup(struct cpsw_slave
> *slave, int slave_num,
> struct eth_device *edev = &slave->edev;
> struct device_d *dev = &slave->dev;
> int ret;
> - struct phy_device *phy;
>
> - phy = mdiobus_scan(&priv->miibus, priv->slaves[slave_num].phy_id);
> - if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(phy);
> - goto err_out;
> - }
> -
> - phy->dev.device_node = priv->slaves[slave_num].dev.device_node;
> - ret = phy_register_device(phy);
Add "edev->parent = dev;" before calling phy_device_connect.
It needed to find device_node (see phy.c line about 333 in
of_mdio_find_phy function).
(Remove instruction "edev->parent = dev;" below in cpsw_slave_setup to
avoid
to has it twice in the function).
> + ret = phy_device_connect(edev, &priv->miibus, slave->phy_id,
> + cpsw_adjust_link, 0, slave->phy_if);
> if (ret)
> goto err_out;
>
> @@ -957,7 +945,7 @@ static int cpsw_slave_setup(struct cpsw_slave
> *slave, int slave_num,
> return 0;
>
> err_register_dev:
> - phy_unregister_device(phy);
> + phy_unregister_device(edev->phydev);
> err_register_edev:
> unregister_device(dev);
> err_out:
> --
> 2.15.1
Regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-19 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-16 7:39 Sascha Hauer
2018-02-17 9:18 ` Andreas Schmidt
2018-02-19 6:54 ` Sascha Hauer
2018-02-19 11:08 ` list [this message]
2018-02-22 7:17 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b7c837eb63fe7d64236a54b5da612904@schmidt-andreas.de \
--to=list@schmidt-andreas.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox