From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:53:21 +0100 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1pU1vE-00CYBN-W6 for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:53:21 +0100 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pU1vD-0005Ec-Jk for lore@pengutronix.de; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:53:20 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=KCIilU+LqeK90SNrHxaII/Eq9F0yTBsegT9rDYCFlJE=; b=guJobosCdCAFIb8Rdbxcn8Wf1N VALwdqsNu+CkF0gb9tDIXz/CqDdtRF+Kw0oAcyvx9ipoAQ3lxZrrQSDzwQD+y6AIQoeWrz1gRmsdu LVjtl3f3DPy0mJwDolIkF3ScgJCNWaw0H+f7hCXOzUT+DdxioRFIkbZ+Wo2n9PscUgwJCnZZ+MJGH FmNJP5snQ/XApqza02WxlmbMxgB1YWg6yCJ597kaLy0OCR9/0nz7GZC3TzCcRpMrNu9B7Tpso5mWa 7JsWwlHBLwTFzZjp47sDdJ8pMsKkxskSzycatWC1dMsWnjFDAKI3fWruFbDcncBfubjvTlToAWJXu /HqWHUUQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pU1tz-003Oc5-Qe; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:52:03 +0000 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pU1ts-003Oam-3f for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:52:00 +0000 Received: from ptz.office.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:900:1d::77] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pU1to-0005Ab-Vj; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:51:53 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:51:52 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.2 Content-Language: en-US To: Marco Felsch Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org References: <20230217173057.1839835-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> <20230220084809.f7xcbqzwbz5jzsd6@pengutronix.de> From: Ahmad Fatoum In-Reply-To: <20230220084809.f7xcbqzwbz5jzsd6@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230220_005156_347721_12418407 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.97 ) X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2607:7c80:54:3::133 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on metis.ext.pengutronix.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/20] dts: avoid DT breakage new fancy DTC v1.7.0 syntax X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de) On 20.02.23 09:48, Marco Felsch wrote: > Hi Ahmad, > > On 23-02-17, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: >> The fresh v1.7.0 release of the device tree compiler now contains >> fancy new syntax: >> >> &{i2c1/at24@50} { >> partitions { >> /* something */ >> }; >> }; >> >> instead of &{/soc/bus1/bus2/i2c@12345678/at24@50}, which is overly >> verbose or &i2c1 { at24@50 }, which will break once someone renames >> it upstream to please the schema checker. > > Just to double check this and I understood you correctly, the compiler > will complain if we specify: > > &{i2c1/at24@50} { }; > > and the node is not exisitng anymore? Exactly. > > Regards, > Marco > -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |