From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> To: Konstantin Kletschke <konstantin.kletschke@inside-m2m.de>, barebox@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Beaglebone Black defconfigs Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 12:55:41 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <e61ce67f-57ba-a593-d624-97ab7d28fb73@pengutronix.de> (raw) In-Reply-To: <97CB9693-C624-4014-8E73-6FDCA035BD62@inside-m2m.de> Hi, On 11.06.21 12:05, Konstantin Kletschke wrote: > Hello, > > I am currently trying to bring up barebox for my Beaglebone Black devices. > > I did an "ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf- make am335x_mlo_defconfig”, make and > copied resulting barebox-am33xx-beaglebone-mlo.img to MLO into my FAT boot partition. > > Then I did "ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf- make omap3530_beagle_defconfig”, make > and copied resulting barebox-beagleboard.img to barebox.bin into my boot FAT. The docs (https://www.barebox.org/doc/latest/boards/am335x.html) say the second stage defconfig is omap_defconfig. > Is the the different prefix in the defconfigs (am33… vs. omap35…) reasonable? Second stage is much less size limited, because it runs from external SDRAM. This allows having a config that builds images for multiple different boards and SoCs. First stage runs from small SRAM, so images usually contain only code for a single SoC. I haven't checked, but this may explain the different naming. > Is this approach generally reasonable? > > Many references in internet to matching > defconfigs I found refer to non existing ones, there seems to happen great overhaul meanwhile. I haven't been using barebox long enough, but I assume you found references to old non-multi-image enabled OMAP support. Modern barebox platforms build multiple images for different boards in one go and thus there are less defconfigs. > I am also asking because, well, it does not work: > > barebox 2021.05.0-00093-g7689055a8 #2 Fri Jun 11 09:01:36 CEST 2021 > > > Board: TI AM335x BeagleBone > detected 'BeagleBone Black' > omap-hsmmc 48060000.mmc@0.of: registered as mmc0 > omap-hsmmc 481d8000.mmc@0.of: registered as mmc1 > booting from MMC > mmc1: detected MMC card version 5.1 > mmc1: registered mmc1 > unable to handle paging request at address 0x4020f010 > pc : [<8ffbbd5a>] lr : [<8ffbbd89>] > sp : 9ffeffb0 ip : 00000000 fp : 00014e2c > r10: 00125920 r9 : 8ffbbce5 r8 : 9ffe4000 > r7 : 80000000 r6 : 9fe1a46e r5 : 402f0400 r4 : 8ffbbcdc > r3 : 0000060a r2 : 4020f010 r1 : abe742c3 r0 : 80000000 > Flags: nzCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 > > no stack data available > > This repeats endlessly. I investigated the data sheet and if I am correct 0x4020f010 seems to be a reserved> area in L3 memory map. Compiling barebox for one SoC and running it on another can lead to funny effects. Cheers, Ahmad > > Kind Regards > Konsti > > INSIDE M2M GmbH > Konstantin Kletschke > Berenbosteler Straße 76 B > 30823 Garbsen > > Telefon: +49 (0) 5137 90950136 > Mobil: +49 (0) 151 15256238 > Fax: +49 (0) 5137 9095010 > > konstantin.kletschke@inside-m2m.de > http://www.inside-m2m.de > > Geschäftsführung: Michael Emmert, Ingo Haase, Dr. Fred Könemann, Derek Uhlig > HRB: 111204, AG Hannover > > > _______________________________________________ > barebox mailing list > barebox@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox > -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-11 11:02 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-06-11 10:05 Konstantin Kletschke 2021-06-11 10:55 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message] 2021-06-11 11:33 ` Konstantin Kletschke 2021-06-11 11:08 ` Sascha Hauer 2021-06-11 11:45 ` Konstantin Kletschke 2021-06-11 12:08 ` Sascha Hauer 2021-06-11 12:13 ` Konstantin Kletschke
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=e61ce67f-57ba-a593-d624-97ab7d28fb73@pengutronix.de \ --to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \ --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=konstantin.kletschke@inside-m2m.de \ --subject='Re: Beaglebone Black defconfigs' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox