From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Konstantin Kletschke <konstantin.kletschke@inside-m2m.de>,
barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Beaglebone Black defconfigs
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 12:55:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e61ce67f-57ba-a593-d624-97ab7d28fb73@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97CB9693-C624-4014-8E73-6FDCA035BD62@inside-m2m.de>
Hi,
On 11.06.21 12:05, Konstantin Kletschke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am currently trying to bring up barebox for my Beaglebone Black devices.
>
> I did an "ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf- make am335x_mlo_defconfig”, make and
> copied resulting barebox-am33xx-beaglebone-mlo.img to MLO into my FAT boot partition.
>
> Then I did "ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf- make omap3530_beagle_defconfig”, make
> and copied resulting barebox-beagleboard.img to barebox.bin into my boot FAT.
The docs (https://www.barebox.org/doc/latest/boards/am335x.html) say the second stage
defconfig is omap_defconfig.
> Is the the different prefix in the defconfigs (am33… vs. omap35…) reasonable?
Second stage is much less size limited, because it runs from external SDRAM. This allows
having a config that builds images for multiple different boards and SoCs.
First stage runs from small SRAM, so images usually contain only code for a single
SoC. I haven't checked, but this may explain the different naming.
> Is this approach generally reasonable?
>
> Many references in internet to matching
> defconfigs I found refer to non existing ones, there seems to happen great overhaul meanwhile.
I haven't been using barebox long enough, but I assume you found references
to old non-multi-image enabled OMAP support. Modern barebox platforms build
multiple images for different boards in one go and thus there are less
defconfigs.
> I am also asking because, well, it does not work:
>
> barebox 2021.05.0-00093-g7689055a8 #2 Fri Jun 11 09:01:36 CEST 2021
>
>
> Board: TI AM335x BeagleBone
> detected 'BeagleBone Black'
> omap-hsmmc 48060000.mmc@0.of: registered as mmc0
> omap-hsmmc 481d8000.mmc@0.of: registered as mmc1
> booting from MMC
> mmc1: detected MMC card version 5.1
> mmc1: registered mmc1
> unable to handle paging request at address 0x4020f010
> pc : [<8ffbbd5a>] lr : [<8ffbbd89>]
> sp : 9ffeffb0 ip : 00000000 fp : 00014e2c
> r10: 00125920 r9 : 8ffbbce5 r8 : 9ffe4000
> r7 : 80000000 r6 : 9fe1a46e r5 : 402f0400 r4 : 8ffbbcdc
> r3 : 0000060a r2 : 4020f010 r1 : abe742c3 r0 : 80000000
> Flags: nzCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32
>
> no stack data available
>
> This repeats endlessly. I investigated the data sheet and if I am correct 0x4020f010 seems to be a reserved> area in L3 memory map.
Compiling barebox for one SoC and running it on another can lead
to funny effects.
Cheers,
Ahmad
>
> Kind Regards
> Konsti
>
> INSIDE M2M GmbH
> Konstantin Kletschke
> Berenbosteler Straße 76 B
> 30823 Garbsen
>
> Telefon: +49 (0) 5137 90950136
> Mobil: +49 (0) 151 15256238
> Fax: +49 (0) 5137 9095010
>
> konstantin.kletschke@inside-m2m.de
> http://www.inside-m2m.de
>
> Geschäftsführung: Michael Emmert, Ingo Haase, Dr. Fred Könemann, Derek Uhlig
> HRB: 111204, AG Hannover
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-11 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-11 10:05 Konstantin Kletschke
2021-06-11 10:55 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2021-06-11 11:33 ` Konstantin Kletschke
2021-06-11 11:08 ` Sascha Hauer
2021-06-11 11:45 ` Konstantin Kletschke
2021-06-11 12:08 ` Sascha Hauer
2021-06-11 12:13 ` Konstantin Kletschke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e61ce67f-57ba-a593-d624-97ab7d28fb73@pengutronix.de \
--to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=konstantin.kletschke@inside-m2m.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox