mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Kerkmann <s.kerkmann@pengutronix.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: BAREBOX <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] downgrade noisy debug calls in block devices and ramfs
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:12:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc2b9447-9c2e-473b-94ab-991e13bf6095@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZyDkFmfY5-X52Rmy@pengutronix.de>

Hi Sascha,

On 29.10.24 14:33, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 05:17:00PM +0100, Stefan Kerkmann wrote:
>> These two patches are the outcome of an investigation why loading a
>> fitimage from an eMMC took nearly 7s - the sheer amount of generated
>> debugging messages slowed down the system by a factor of ~21 with
>> KConfig options:
>>
>> 	CONFIG_COMPILE_LOGLEVEL=7
>> 	CONFIG_DEFAULT_LOGLEVEL=6
>>
>> Which is the current default combination for barebox.
> 
> This is not the default combination. The default is:
> 
> CONFIG_COMPILE_LOGLEVEL=6
> CONFIG_DEFAULT_LOGLEVEL=7
> 

Oh! You are right, I totally mixed that up.

> The rationale is:
> 
> Do not compile in debug messages by default (CONFIG_COMPILE_LOGLEVEL=6)
> unless DEBUG is defined in a source file. When DEBUG is defined then make
> sure the messages are printed (CONFIG_DEFAULT_LOGLEVEL=7).
> 
> There are tons of debug messages throughout the code which normally
> shouldn't be compiled into the binay.
> 

When triaging a problem I like to gather a good overview by generally enabling
all debugging messages. But the important bits would drown in the block/ramfs
messages. So I would still argue that it is worthwhile to downgrade the level to
verbose debug.

Cheers,
Stefan

> Sascha
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                       | Stefan Kerkmann             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                   | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-128  |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686       | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9    |




  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-29 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-28 16:17 Stefan Kerkmann
2024-10-28 16:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: downgrade noisy debug calls to verbose debug Stefan Kerkmann
2024-10-28 16:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] fs: ramfs: " Stefan Kerkmann
2024-10-28 16:44 ` [PATCH 0/2] downgrade noisy debug calls in block devices and ramfs Ahmad Fatoum
2024-10-28 16:57   ` Stefan Kerkmann
2024-10-29 13:33 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-10-29 13:55   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-10-29 14:12   ` Stefan Kerkmann [this message]
2024-10-30  8:50     ` Sascha Hauer
2024-10-30  8:47 ` Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fc2b9447-9c2e-473b-94ab-991e13bf6095@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.kerkmann@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox