From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by casper.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SfVzg-0006v1-P0 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:51:17 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SfVzS-0005yb-K3 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:51:06 +0200 Received: from h96-60-251-119.cncrtn.dsl.dynamic.tds.net ([96.60.251.119]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:51:02 +0200 Received: from jkirk865 by h96-60-251-119.cncrtn.dsl.dynamic.tds.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:51:02 +0200 From: Jerry Kirk Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:50:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: How should a new internally developed board be handled? To: barebox@lists.infradead.org Still looking for some more information on this topic... _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox