From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.cvg.de ([62.153.82.30]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1UdGsz-00030x-Ce for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 17 May 2013 09:23:38 +0000 From: Enrico Scholz References: <1368537296-19610-1-git-send-email-enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de> <20130515062811.GB32299@pengutronix.de> <20130517082411.GW20989@pengutronix.de> Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 11:22:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20130517082411.GW20989@pengutronix.de> (Sascha Hauer's message of "Fri, 17 May 2013 10:24:11 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM v7: fix mmu-off operation To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Sascha Hauer writes: >> So you can drop this stack push by using r12 instead of r10. That's fine >> I think, but should be a patch of its own. Can you resend this as two >> patches? > > Oh, I just saw you can't since then r12 would be corrupted when > v7_mmu_cache_flush is called from v7_mmu_cache_off. > > Applied this one to master and the rest to -next with a small > modification. ok; I was about to split patches by renaming 'r10' to 'r12' in the first step (which will work afais because r12 will be pushed on stack on top of v7_mmu_cache_flush()) but was interrupted by other work. Enrico _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox