mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sascha Hauer <sha@pengutronix.de>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mci: add new MCI_BROKEN_CD option for testing
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 15:40:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220808134048.GS31528@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220725115856.1288819-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>

On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 01:58:56PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> In remote labs co-located with other hardware, we've observed card
> detect levers of different boards to sporadically fail to detect
> the card, e.g. because the cable on the usbsdmux was yanked around
> by accident. When this happens, barebox usually boots up normally as
> the card detect is ignored and then Linux waits indefinitely for
> the card-detect to turn active. Add a new config option that can be
> enabled to avoid these issues altogether.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
>   - use early exit instead of if-else
>   - don't fail mci_card_probe if of_register_fixup fails
> ---
>  drivers/mci/Kconfig    | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  drivers/mci/mci-core.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mci/Kconfig b/drivers/mci/Kconfig
> index 21d53c0c3f0b..651e59259790 100644
> --- a/drivers/mci/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mci/Kconfig
> @@ -56,6 +56,21 @@ config MCI_MMC_GPP_PARTITIONS
>  	  Note: by default, 'MMC' devices have no 'general purpose partitions',
>  	  it requires a special one-time configuration step to enable them.
>  
> +config MCI_BROKEN_CD
> +	bool "ignore card-detect pin on boot and in OS"
> +	help
> +	  Say 'y' here to have barebox unconditionally ignore the
> +	  card-detect pin for its own operation and manipulate the
> +	  kernel DT, so all detected MCI cards are polled instead
> +	  of expecting the card detect lever to behave correctly.
> +	  If you need more fine grained control use of_property
> +	  in an init script:
> +
> +	    of_property -fd mmc0 cd-gpios
> +	    of_property -fs mmc0 broken-cd
> +
> +	  If unsure, say 'n' here.
> +
>  comment "--- MCI host drivers ---"
>  
>  config MCI_DW
> diff --git a/drivers/mci/mci-core.c b/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
> index 82e2f82f5377..4db2253c3a80 100644
> --- a/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
> @@ -1727,6 +1727,27 @@ static int mci_register_partition(struct mci_part *part)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int of_broken_cd_fixup(struct device_node *root, void *ctx)
> +{
> +	struct device_d *hw_dev = ctx;
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +	char *name;
> +
> +	name = of_get_reproducible_name(hw_dev->device_node);
> +	np = of_find_node_by_reproducible_name(root, name);
> +	free(name);
> +	if (!np) {
> +		dev_warn(hw_dev, "Cannot find nodepath %s, cannot fixup\n",
> +			 hw_dev->device_node->full_name);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	of_property_write_bool(np, "cd-gpios", false);
> +	of_property_write_bool(np, "broken-cd", true);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * Probe an MCI card at the given host interface
>   * @param mci MCI device instance
> @@ -1737,10 +1758,13 @@ static int mci_card_probe(struct mci *mci)
>  	struct mci_host *host = mci->host;
>  	int i, rc, disknum, ret;
>  
> -	if (host->card_present && !host->card_present(host) &&
> -	    !host->non_removable) {
> -		dev_err(&mci->dev, "no card inserted\n");
> -		return -ENODEV;
> +	if (host->card_present && !host->card_present(host) && !host->non_removable) {
> +		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MCI_BROKEN_CD)) {
> +			dev_err(&mci->dev, "no card inserted\n");
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +		}
> +
> +		dev_info(&mci->dev, "no card inserted (ignoring)\n");
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = regulator_enable(host->supply);
> @@ -1818,6 +1842,10 @@ static int mci_card_probe(struct mci *mci)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MCI_BROKEN_CD) && !host->no_sd &&
> +	    dev_of_node(host->hw_dev))
> +		of_register_fixup(of_broken_cd_fixup, host->hw_dev);

This fixup is only registered when the card is probed, i.e. when it's
used in barebox. Shouldn't it be registered in mci_register() instead?

Sascha


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-08 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-25 11:58 Ahmad Fatoum
2022-08-08 13:40 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2022-08-08 13:43   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-08-08 13:55     ` Sascha Hauer
2022-09-07  8:37       ` Ahmad Fatoum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220808134048.GS31528@pengutronix.de \
    --to=sha@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox