From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <sha@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mci: add new MCI_BROKEN_CD option for testing
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 15:43:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8b16aab-e4a1-3ed3-1502-ac5e16884311@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220808134048.GS31528@pengutronix.de>
Hello Sascha,
On 08.08.22 15:40, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 01:58:56PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> In remote labs co-located with other hardware, we've observed card
>> detect levers of different boards to sporadically fail to detect
>> the card, e.g. because the cable on the usbsdmux was yanked around
>> by accident. When this happens, barebox usually boots up normally as
>> the card detect is ignored and then Linux waits indefinitely for
>> the card-detect to turn active. Add a new config option that can be
>> enabled to avoid these issues altogether.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
>> ---
>> v1 -> v2:
>> - use early exit instead of if-else
>> - don't fail mci_card_probe if of_register_fixup fails
>> ---
>> drivers/mci/Kconfig | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> drivers/mci/mci-core.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mci/Kconfig b/drivers/mci/Kconfig
>> index 21d53c0c3f0b..651e59259790 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mci/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/mci/Kconfig
>> @@ -56,6 +56,21 @@ config MCI_MMC_GPP_PARTITIONS
>> Note: by default, 'MMC' devices have no 'general purpose partitions',
>> it requires a special one-time configuration step to enable them.
>>
>> +config MCI_BROKEN_CD
>> + bool "ignore card-detect pin on boot and in OS"
>> + help
>> + Say 'y' here to have barebox unconditionally ignore the
>> + card-detect pin for its own operation and manipulate the
>> + kernel DT, so all detected MCI cards are polled instead
>> + of expecting the card detect lever to behave correctly.
>> + If you need more fine grained control use of_property
>> + in an init script:
>> +
>> + of_property -fd mmc0 cd-gpios
>> + of_property -fs mmc0 broken-cd
>> +
>> + If unsure, say 'n' here.
>> +
>> comment "--- MCI host drivers ---"
>>
>> config MCI_DW
>> diff --git a/drivers/mci/mci-core.c b/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
>> index 82e2f82f5377..4db2253c3a80 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
>> @@ -1727,6 +1727,27 @@ static int mci_register_partition(struct mci_part *part)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int of_broken_cd_fixup(struct device_node *root, void *ctx)
>> +{
>> + struct device_d *hw_dev = ctx;
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> + char *name;
>> +
>> + name = of_get_reproducible_name(hw_dev->device_node);
>> + np = of_find_node_by_reproducible_name(root, name);
>> + free(name);
>> + if (!np) {
>> + dev_warn(hw_dev, "Cannot find nodepath %s, cannot fixup\n",
>> + hw_dev->device_node->full_name);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + of_property_write_bool(np, "cd-gpios", false);
>> + of_property_write_bool(np, "broken-cd", true);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> /**
>> * Probe an MCI card at the given host interface
>> * @param mci MCI device instance
>> @@ -1737,10 +1758,13 @@ static int mci_card_probe(struct mci *mci)
>> struct mci_host *host = mci->host;
>> int i, rc, disknum, ret;
>>
>> - if (host->card_present && !host->card_present(host) &&
>> - !host->non_removable) {
>> - dev_err(&mci->dev, "no card inserted\n");
>> - return -ENODEV;
>> + if (host->card_present && !host->card_present(host) && !host->non_removable) {
>> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MCI_BROKEN_CD)) {
>> + dev_err(&mci->dev, "no card inserted\n");
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev_info(&mci->dev, "no card inserted (ignoring)\n");
>> }
>>
>> ret = regulator_enable(host->supply);
>> @@ -1818,6 +1842,10 @@ static int mci_card_probe(struct mci *mci)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MCI_BROKEN_CD) && !host->no_sd &&
>> + dev_of_node(host->hw_dev))
>> + of_register_fixup(of_broken_cd_fixup, host->hw_dev);
>
> This fixup is only registered when the card is probed, i.e. when it's
> used in barebox. Shouldn't it be registered in mci_register() instead?
This is intentional. We only know that cards barebox successfully probed
are indeed available.
Cheers,
Ahmad
>
> Sascha
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-08 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-25 11:58 Ahmad Fatoum
2022-08-08 13:40 ` Sascha Hauer
2022-08-08 13:43 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2022-08-08 13:55 ` Sascha Hauer
2022-09-07 8:37 ` Ahmad Fatoum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c8b16aab-e4a1-3ed3-1502-ac5e16884311@pengutronix.de \
--to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sha@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox